Nrdc report the dating game

06 Nov

Other measures the NRDC believes are necessary include ensuring that date labels are clearly and logically located on packages so the information is easy for the consumer to locate, while it would also like to see quality-based dates removed from non-perishable foods.Hold on before dumping that gallon milk down the sink; just because it’s past the “sell-by” date doesn’t necessarily mean it needs to be thrown out. The report called for changes in the way food manufacturers label their products.Using other people’s research or ideas without giving them due credit is plagiarism.Since Bib Me™ makes it easy to create citations, build bibliographies and acknowledge other people’s work, there is no excuse to plagiarize.One such problem is the use of production, pack, sell by and use by dates - which do not consistently have the same meaning depending on the manufacturer and retailer.This in turn can result in the people who buy the food either throwing it out while it is still acceptable to eat, or instead mistakenly leaving food uneaten for too long - resulting in its expiration.While date labeling was historically designed to provide indicators of freshness, generally these dates simply represent manufacturer suggestions for when food is at peak quality.

nrdc report the dating game-61nrdc report the dating game-72

In addition to that, the organisation says products should only show dates that are useful to the consumer.

Those dates do not indicate the safety of your food, and generally speaking, they’re not regulated. In fact, even the half-gallon and quart of the same fat free milk had different dates. And yet somehow, we all operate on the premise that those sell by or use by dates know better than we do whether our food is still good to eat.

Here’s what you need to know and importantly, how you can help us at NRDC and the Harvard Food Law and Policy Clinic clear up the confusion. In fact, according to one industry study, 90 percent of Americans at least occasionally throw food away prematurely because they mistakenly interpret the sell by (or use by) date to mean their food is unsafe; 25 percent do so every time. , it would mean the average household of four could be spending 5-450 on discarding food that is perfectly fine, just because they misinterpret the label date. We took a deep dive into the intricacies of the sell by and use by date labeling laws in the U. The main thing to understand is that food-borne illness comes from contamination, not spoilage.

consumers may be wasting money and prematurely throwing away perfectly good food because they misinterpret food labels as indicators of food safety, a report by the Natural Resources Defense Council and Harvard Law School’s Food Law and Policy Clinic said.

“Expiration dates are in need of some serious myth-busting because they’re leading us to waste money and throw out perfectly good food, along with all of the resources that went into growing it,” said Dana Gunders, staff scientist with the NRDC’s food and agriculture program.